Archive for the ‘News’ Category

Broadcast TV is dying

Sunday, March 1st, 2009

As if there’s really been anything worth watching in over 10 years.

Ratings over all for broadcast networks continue to decline, making it harder for them to justify their high prices for advertising. Cable channels are spending more on original shows, which bring in new viewers and dampen their appetites for buying repeats of broadcast shows.

For the networks, the crisis is twofold: cultural and financial. For viewers, the result is more low-cost reality shows, prime-time talk and news programs and sports…

I think TV is doing just as well as ever, just the use of a flawed ratings system doesn’t count the way most people watch TV.  The Nielsen’s have much of the data for those of us that time-shift, but the networks don’t use it yet and their advertisers don’t want them to.

TV is no longer about having the family gather around the idiot box for 20 minutes of commercials and 40 minutes of a brain-dead pop culture show. It’s about selective, almost custom programming. It’s about time-shifting to put programming on the viewer’s own schedule, not the broadcasters. It’s about being able to watch the same thing whether you’re in your living room, at your desk, or sitting around a laundromat with just an iPod.

You only need to look at the myriad devices that enable people to carry their programming with them. As soon as “Big TV” figures out that their viewers are still there, just not on the couch, and take advantage of the tremendous number of hardware platforms out there, they’ll continue to make money hand over fist.

Anybody with Google can figure out how to record something with TiVo, dump it to their hard drive to watch at their desk or stretched out with their netbook, convert it to MPEG to burn it to DVD, convert it to 3G2 for their phone, convert it to MP4 for their iPods, etc. Of course, if anybody is to go to the trouble, they will most likely take an extra 5 minutes to cut out the commercials.

If the studios would just offer these common files of their shows available for download, commercials intact, their current business model would still work. Viewers are the same. But the hardware, the time slot, and the conventional venues have changed.

What do you think?

nytimes.com | wikipedia.org

Convert $350 Billion of bailout into Tax Holiday!

Monday, December 1st, 2008

Convert Paulson’s Last $350 Billion into Tax Holiday, says U.S. Congressman

“Billions of Dollars for Taxpayers, but Not One More Penny for Executive Bailouts”

WASHINGTON, D.C. - As millions of Americans are hoping to maximize their holiday shopping budgets on today’s Black Friday bargains, U.S. Congressman Louie Gohmert is fighting to prevent more outrageous spending sprees by Washington with taxpayer dollars going to executive cronies.

With $350 billion of the $700 billion bailout still available to Paulson pending Congressional approval, a conservative Texas lawmaker is proposing to put that money towards a tax holiday from both personal income tax and FICA tax for Americans during January and February of 2009.

He stated, “By instating a temporary tax holiday, we could electrify the American economy and provide overwhelming relief to taxpayers, all for less than the cost of the current failed Paulson-Pelosi bailout system.”

“We need to give this money to the people who earned it. I am sick of Washington millionaires trying to decide which of their cronies should get the next wad of taxpayer money,” Rep. Louie Gohmert continued. “Think about how much you would have if you didn’t have any social security or income tax withheld from your pay check, or if you didn’t have to pay those taxes for January and February! Americans could take and invest their own money where they believe it should go – to paying down mortgages, buying a new car, making credit card payments. The economy would get relief where it is needed the most. Why try to decide how to prevent foreclosures? Just give taxpayers their own money to catch up on their payments. Those in lower income brackets who are hit the hardest by the FICA tax would see huge money back, and then THEY could choose who should benefit from their hard earned money.  Even the self-employed and small business owners would receive a fantastic amount of their own much-needed money, and they will be able to invest that back into their businesses and even create the ability to hire more people.”

Gohmert is currently preparing a bill to declare the tax holiday for January and February of 2009 and is also gathering support at the same time. He said, “We can save more home mortgages, increase employment, and boost economic growth for a lower price tag with this plan than with any centralized bureaucratic program, all by giving the power back to the taxpayers. I am demanding that not another penny goes to executive bailouts, but these billions of taxpayer dollars should go to the taxpayers who earned them.”

According to American Solutions, a conservative think tank founded by former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Americans pay $101.6 billion per month in personal income tax and $65.6 billion per month in FICA tax. Under Gohmert’s proposed plan, all of these taxes would not be paid during January and February of 2009, and the money would stay in the hands of American taxpayers – the ones who best know where economic stimulus should be targeted. Gohmert’s two month tax holiday would stimulate the economy while costing less than the remainder of the Paulson-Pelosi bailout plan.

Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) has also recently proposed returning all 2008 income taxes to American taxpayers as a solution to boost the ailing economy, as he believes taxpayers, rather than the government, should be using their hard-earned money to choose the economy’s winners and losers.

Please Digg this!  digg.com | Source:  gohmert.house.gov

The Pilot’s Kerry Dougherty met my friend Dan

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008

The Virginian-Pilot  October 15, 2008
Kerry Dougherty
Virginian-Pilot columnist

A woman alone. After dark. In downtown Norfolk.

A recipe for fear?

Not last Tuesday. Safest place in town, I thought as I pulled into the dimly lit parking garage behind City Hall.

It was, after all, Dirty Harry Night at Norfolk City Council. Dozens of law-abiding gun owners were expected, all openly packing heat, to protest the city’s alleged harassment of a gun owner who had been stopped several times for carrying a weapon.

The man in the bull’s-eye is Danladi Moore, a 24-year-old Hampton man who seems to get in trouble every time he comes to Norfolk. After two encounters with the city’s police, Moore was awarded $10,000 in July, to avoid a court battle.

The security guard barely had time to spend the loot before he says he was booted from an HRT bus – again, for carrying a weapon – and told he might be arrested.

On Tuesday night, just hours after he and others testified before a stone-faced City Council and received assurances that Norfolk police understood Virginia’s gun laws, Moore was stopped again.

He claims he was disarmed, handcuffed and charged with trespassing at Waterside.

Cha-ching.

“Open-carry” is a concept that’s alien to many. While everyone seems to know that the commonwealth issues permits to carry concealed weapons, many don’t know that anyone who can legally own a gun can carry it without a permit, provided it’s in the open.

Ignorance of the law explains the panicky 911 calls to report Moore poking around town with a holstered sidearm.

But it doesn’t justify a police response that, according to Moore, resulted in officers hassling him and insisting he had no right to carry a weapon.

Why open-carry? Some say it’s the comfortable way to carry a gun when it’s hot. Others insist that a visible weapon is a powerful crime deterrent.

“Someone said they thought guys who open-carry are trying to look cool,” Moore told me Wednesday. “That’s not me. I’m trying to look like a guy who doesn’t want to be robbed.”

Moore believes he may have thwarted a convenience store holdup once when a suspicious person left after spying his gun.

His latest brush with authorities came after a knot of the open-carry guys headed to Hooters at the conclusion of the council meeting. Most sported weapons, yet their accessories reportedly attracted no attention in the restaurant. No surprise there; no one looks at men at Hooters.

Later, in Waterside, Moore said he and a friend were stopped by two police officers, told they couldn’t bring guns into the complex, and ordered to leave.

Moore balked and insisted he was within his rights. Within minutes, Moore claims he was disarmed, handcuffed and charged with trespassing. He has a court date in November.

Before leaving council chambers Tuesday night, I spoke with Moore and asked him about his holstered gun.

“It’s a Springfield XD .45,” he said, adding with a grin, “I bought it with some of the money I got from Norfolk this summer.”

Before this is over, Moore may have a matched set.

Source:  hamptonroads.com

The Bailout: Questions and Answers

Monday, October 6th, 2008

What is the libertarian position on the bailouts?

Most libertarians do not support bailouts, which force hard-working Americans to subsidize failing businesses, either through taxation or inflation. The current bailout proposals will cost every man, woman, and child in the U.S. about $3,000 apiece, and perhaps far more. What effect will losing this much buying power have on your family?

Such bailouts only encourage further mismanagement of funds and siphon money away from efficient businesses, causing layoffs in the latter. Thus, in addition to several thousand dollars in lost buying power, bailouts can actually cost you your job!

What would happen if the government didn’t take these actions?

If the government didn’t bail out the failing banks and mortgage companies, their stocks would take a nosedive. The stockholders and employees of these firms, not the American people as a whole, would suffer the ill effects of their poor lending practices.

However, other lending institutions would learn that making bad loans or investments to boost profits temporarily could lead to a permanent loss of their livelihood. Stockholders and fund managers would avoid risky companies in the future and monitor management decisions more closely. Consequently, letting the failing institutions of today bear the responsibility for their poor judgment is likely to prevent additional failures tomorrow.

Source: Dr. Mary Ruwart – ruwart.com

The shoe is on the other foot this time

Friday, October 3rd, 2008

Source.

Duck Tales explains the Federal Reserve

Wednesday, October 1st, 2008

Some info on the Sirius/XM merger

Friday, July 25th, 2008

I’ve had Sirius for probably 4 or 5 years now.  Within that period I also had XM for a month and hated it.  I’ve stuck with Sirius and loved every minute of it.  Between Neil and I, I would say we’ve sold a dozen people or more on the service.  It truly has something for everyone.  Initially I was very disappointed to hear that the two wanted to merge.  I though prices would go up from reduced competition.  I thought the play lists would become a Clear Channel knock-off like XM more commercial.  Actually, these things will still probably happen, but there’s not all bad news coming out of this:

Among the conditions that both companies had already accepted were à la carte programming that would give consumers flexibility in which channels they pay for, the permission for any electronics company to develop devices that would receive the service and a price freeze for three years.

Shares in both companies rose on Wednesday in anticipation of approval. XM rose 94 cents, or 10.3 percent, to close at $10.04. Sirius closed at $2.68, up 30 cents, or 12.6 percent.

Customized programming and better numbers from both companies is definitely something I can get behind.  We can only hope that the à la carte programming is a huge success and cable and satellite television providers follow suit.  Source.

85% of US Unhappy with Economy

Thursday, July 17th, 2008

According to a Rockefeller Foundation poll, 85% of us believe that the country is on the wrong track.  Nearly half of those between ages 18 and 29 say America was better in the 90s.  People in that age group weren’t that old in he 90s, however, and you should probably ask their parents what they think.  82% want public works projects, paid for, of course, by our taxes, to save the economy.  70% say more government programs should help those now struggling.

Why do so many people think that the government that got us into this financial mess actually has the power or the know-how to fix things?  Why is everybody giving up and holding out their hands to wait for the government to take care of them?  Where is the work ethic that once pushed people to either work more or make yourself worth more to earn more money?

The amount of government we have has gotten us to where we are now.  More government will only mean more taxes and more problems.  We need to eliminate income tax and personal property tax right off the bat.  From there we need to reduce our military involvement from 130 countries around the world to one: ours.  We need to stop foreign aid and take of ourselves for a change.

We need to drastically reconfigure our government to a simpler, more economical version, the likes of which we haven’t seen for nearly 100 years.  But as long as 70% of people think MORE government is the answer, we will only continue along this path of decline.  That being the case, it looks more and more like our experiment in democracy is failing and this country is being swallowed by socialism.